|
Post by pickle20 on Jun 12, 2019 13:25:18 GMT -5
Wikipedia is probably as close as it comes to being unbiased and I'm sure it seeps through even there. Anyway, have you tried any suggested searches today? It's an old story, if it ever even was a story. So basically any time a poster cites a news source you could discount it as biased unless it is biased to your ideology. I thought so. Just because something might be biased doesn't make it factually wrong and you still have to decide whether it's a worthy source or not.
|
|
|
Post by smokey1 on Jun 12, 2019 13:35:33 GMT -5
So basically any time a poster cites a news source you could discount it as biased unless it is biased to your ideology. I thought so. Just because something might be biased doesn't make it factually wrong and you still have to decide whether it's a worthy source or not. In other words you leave yourself open to challenging any source if it doesn't agree with your ideology. So there is no point in citing sources with you.
|
|
|
Post by pickle20 on Jun 12, 2019 13:50:17 GMT -5
Just because something might be biased doesn't make it factually wrong and you still have to decide whether it's a worthy source or not. In other words you leave yourself open to challenging any source if it doesn't agree with your ideology. So there is no point in citing sources with you. Well, how about this: try using sources that don't require blowing a layer of dust off them. Sorry I showed you the topic of this thread was fake news.
|
|
|
Post by smokey1 on Jun 12, 2019 14:06:06 GMT -5
In other words you leave yourself open to challenging any source if it doesn't agree with your ideology. So there is no point in citing sources with you. Well, how about this: try using sources that don't require blowing a layer of dust off them. Sorry I showed you the topic of this thread was fake news. I was using Google and used the top links.
|
|
|
Post by guido2 on Jun 12, 2019 14:12:47 GMT -5
Well, how about this: try using sources that don't require blowing a layer of dust off them. Sorry I showed you the topic of this thread was fake news. I was using Google and used the top links. Geeezuuu. Check the damn post dates and make him happy for God sake. sheeshhhh
|
|
|
Post by stevez51 on Jun 12, 2019 14:15:12 GMT -5
This isn't what Smokey posted about. It's the "suggested searches" when you type someone's name into Google. A drop down menu appears with suggested searches in relation to a person. This happens before you hit enter, or "search." I did it for several conservative people and found no disparaging or negative suggested searches for Alex Jones, Trump and Candace Owens. This is fake news cooked up by the right-wing media on what is appearing to be a very slow news day...even for fake news.It's still early, though. Maybe they can nuke up another Pizzagate story. That's easy to fix. Somebody...quick …. pull up Trump's Tweet account. 🤣 Type in Trump and there will be the latest stories ( always negative ) before you get the Wikipedia profile. But with Trump its expected. Even the evening news will have a negative lead story.
|
|
|
Post by guido2 on Jun 12, 2019 14:17:33 GMT -5
That's easy to fix. Somebody...quick …. pull up Trump's Tweet account. 🤣 Type in Trump and there will be the latest stories ( always negative ) before you get the Wikipedia profile. But with Trump its expected. Even the evening news will have a negative lead story. Having a positive story about Trump is as likely as finding a pearl in an oyster at your local bar.
|
|
|
Post by stevez51 on Jun 12, 2019 14:21:24 GMT -5
I did Smollett this morning and got 2 new stories about him from today. Then the rest were Wikipedia types. This isn't what Smokey posted about. It's the "suggested searches" when you type someone's name into Google. A drop down menu appears with suggested searches in relation to a person. This happens before you hit enter, or "search." I did it for several conservative people and found no disparaging or negative suggested searches for Alex Jones, Trump and Candace Owens. This is fake news cooked up by the right-wing media on what is appearing to be a very slow news day...even for fake news. It's still early, though. Maybe they can nuke up another Pizzagate story. I type in his name and this thread is part of the list. If you Google his name there are 2 current stories. If you want to see the fake racist story you need to go the page 2 & 3.
|
|
|
Post by pickle20 on Jun 12, 2019 14:32:42 GMT -5
This isn't what Smokey posted about. It's the "suggested searches" when you type someone's name into Google. A drop down menu appears with suggested searches in relation to a person. This happens before you hit enter, or "search." I did it for several conservative people and found no disparaging or negative suggested searches for Alex Jones, Trump and Candace Owens. This is fake news cooked up by the right-wing media on what is appearing to be a very slow news day...even for fake news. It's still early, though. Maybe they can nuke up another Pizzagate story. I type in his name and this thread is part of the list. If you Google his name there are 2 current stories. If you want to see the fake racist story you need to go the page 2 & 3. You still don't get it.
|
|