|
Post by Rael on Feb 5, 2023 10:15:25 GMT -5
If adversaries "walked right in by surprise" with a balloon, you have many far more serious problems to worry about than Biden. Jesus, you guys really crack me up, just listen to yourselves. Think outside the box, this could have been tragic, who knows next time. Please keep your rose colored glasses on. They apparently didn't bother you when they were coming in during the Trump administration. You really need to cut back on your hyperbole steroids. Your levels are off the charts.
|
|
|
Post by WKDWZD on Feb 5, 2023 10:22:45 GMT -5
Powers U-2 was caught with its pants down while spying on the USSR during the Cold War, at a time that we didn't have the satellite technology available to do the same job. This balloon wouldn't be able to gather any better info than our satellites can these days. Perhaps you should try that for context. All this hoo-ha is just some over excitable republican, very high-altitude, "Get off my lawn" yelling. This may be the dumbest post you have ever made here. Whether we have satellite technology available is absolutely immaterial to anything. And actually, whether it was a surveillance balloon or not is equally immaterial. The device was in our air space, just as Powers' U2 was in Russia's airspace. This isn't that hard to understand. If it was an uncontrolled asset, it represented a risk to aviation. If it was a controlled asset, it represented a potentially much more dire risk. And we don't know, yet, what capabilities were actually on the balloon. All your silliness is just some blind, liberal, "please don't hurt us" quaking. 🤣
|
|
|
Post by WKDWZD on Feb 5, 2023 10:28:10 GMT -5
Think outside the box, this could have been tragic, who knows next time. Please keep your rose colored glasses on. They apparently didn't bother you when they were coming in during the Trump administration. You really need to cut back on your hyperbole steroids. Your levels are off the charts. It strikes me that he's not the only whose hyperbole steroids are off the charts around here, then again what would I know, apparently I am making my 'dumbest posts ever' today. 🤣
|
|
|
Post by Rael on Feb 5, 2023 10:31:45 GMT -5
They apparently didn't bother you when they were coming in during the Trump administration. You really need to cut back on your hyperbole steroids. Your levels are off the charts. It strikes me that he's not the only whose hyperbole steroids are off the charts around here, then again what would I know, apparently I am making my 'dumbest posts ever' today. 🤣 oh I'm sure you have made dumber posts than today... 😊
|
|
|
Post by stevez51 on Feb 5, 2023 12:19:02 GMT -5
Think outside the box, this could have been tragic, who knows next time. Please keep your rose colored glasses on. They apparently didn't bother you when they were coming in during the Trump administration. You really need to cut back on your hyperbole steroids. Your levels are off the charts. Did any of them fly across the US ..??
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 5, 2023 12:27:13 GMT -5
They apparently didn't bother you when they were coming in during the Trump administration. You really need to cut back on your hyperbole steroids. Your levels are off the charts. Did any of them fly across the US ..?? Some claims are yes three times Ok, trump was just as wrong to, these were unknown to the public it seems
|
|
|
Post by stevez51 on Feb 5, 2023 12:40:00 GMT -5
Did any of them fly across the US ..?? Some claims are yes three times Ok, trump was just as wrong to, these were unknown to the public it seems I've read 5 story links about them, but none say where. One did mention Hawaii. If any of there was true the democrats would have tried to impeach him over it .
|
|
|
Post by JoyinMudville on Feb 5, 2023 18:39:58 GMT -5
China is apparently upset that we shot this thing down over our own waters.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 5, 2023 18:41:35 GMT -5
China is apparently upset that we shot this thing down over our own waters. Within our rights. I don't care, do you?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 5, 2023 18:41:58 GMT -5
China is apparently upset that we shot this thing down over our own waters. Awww poor China. To bad right?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 5, 2023 18:45:11 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by JoyinMudville on Feb 5, 2023 19:13:35 GMT -5
China is apparently upset that we shot this thing down over our own waters. Within our rights. I don't care, do you? It brings me joy
|
|
|
Post by JoyinMudville on Feb 5, 2023 19:15:35 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by JoyinMudville on Feb 5, 2023 19:19:10 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by WKDWZD on Feb 5, 2023 19:19:41 GMT -5
Oh goody! I like me a balloon popping contest, I'll stock up with peanuts and popcorn.
|
|
|
Post by summer23 on Dec 29, 2023 12:21:58 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by soulflower on Dec 29, 2023 12:33:14 GMT -5
It was a weather balloon.
Biggest non-story of the year.
|
|
|
Post by summer23 on Dec 29, 2023 13:22:35 GMT -5
It was a weather balloon. Biggest non-story of the year. Depends on who you choose to believe. U.S. intelligence officials determined the Chinese spy balloon used a U.S. internet provider to communicate
|
|
|
Post by soulflower on Dec 29, 2023 13:29:16 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by summer23 on Dec 29, 2023 13:31:32 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by soulflower on Dec 29, 2023 13:44:10 GMT -5
My link cites a Pentagon spokesperson on the record. Your link cites anonymous intelligence sources. One of which is not currently serving in US intelligence. At the end of the day, we should be able to agree at this point that the balloon was never a national security threat regardless of what kind of 'research' it was used for if the Pentagon was willing to say that on record.
|
|
|
Post by summer23 on Dec 29, 2023 15:36:58 GMT -5
My link cites a Pentagon spokesperson on the record. Your link cites anonymous intelligence sources. One of which is not currently serving in US intelligence. At the end of the day, we should be able to agree at this point that the balloon was never a national security threat regardless of what kind of 'research' it was used for if the Pentagon was willing to say that on record. At the end of the day, you will defend China always.
|
|
|
Post by Ranger John on Dec 30, 2023 8:05:42 GMT -5
My link cites a Pentagon spokesperson on the record. Your link cites anonymous intelligence sources. One of which is not currently serving in US intelligence. At the end of the day, we should be able to agree at this point that the balloon was never a national security threat regardless of what kind of 'research' it was used for if the Pentagon was willing to say that on record. At the end of the day, you will defend China always. and Russia. And Iran. And Hamas.
|
|