|
Post by palealeman on Apr 16, 2024 21:38:37 GMT -5
Plus he falsified business records in furtherance of election interference. Blocking critical information to manipulate the 16 results is certainly a crime if only to have spared us the last f+cking 9 years. Bout time we begin to understand why he has lived a teflon coated life. And the statute of limitations issue is not an issue since as president he couldn't be indicted. But now he can. If paying hush money to Stormy Daniels is "election interference" hauling Trump into court in the middle of a campaign is treason. No one is charged with anything to do with paying "hush money," which, as you have pointed out, is not a crime. However, changing election financial records to cover up paying hush money IS a crime, as you well know.
|
|
|
Post by palealeman on Apr 16, 2024 21:43:42 GMT -5
The only side conducting backroom dialogue with Russia is doing so through Orban. As for treason or sedition keep plugging away. Come back when you got something. Why are you so dead set against your master going to trial? Why don't you want to give him the chance to prove his innocence? Oh come on. You've been shrieking nonsense about Russia for 8+ years. None of it has ever been real. You should see someone about your hallucinations. I'm not dead set against the idea of anyone going to trial. What I am dead set against are "progressives" abusing the justice system for political gain. Because that's fascist. So the reason I'm against Trump going to trial on these charges is because I'm against fascism. Why are you so eager to see the court system weaponized for political reasons? I mean that's something Hitler, Stalin, Mao... you know, all the 20th centuries greatest butchers and abusers of human rights were all about. And if that's what you think is happening today, then you really have no insight into what is really happening. But we know that.
|
|
|
Post by palealeman on Apr 16, 2024 21:46:12 GMT -5
He says as he gaslights democrats. It ain't workin there, Otis. Pump the handle harder. I'm not the one trying to convince someone they aren't seeing what they are seeing. Yea, unfortunately, no one can convince you that you're not seeing what you think your seeing.
|
|
|
Post by palealeman on Apr 16, 2024 21:49:11 GMT -5
If we are stupid enough to let this wanna be dictator back in power he will work to cause unrest so that he can suspend the constitution. Bank on it. Not sure he can pull it off but that will be his goal. Where has he ever given any serious indication he would do anything like that? Examples please. Sounds like more projection of what the left wants to do. You mean like Demented Donald saying clearly that he wants to be a dictator?
|
|
|
Post by upstream on Apr 16, 2024 22:38:32 GMT -5
If we are stupid enough to let this wanna be dictator back in power he will work to cause unrest so that he can suspend the constitution. Bank on it. Not sure he can pull it off but that will be his goal. Where has he ever given any serious indication he would do anything like that? Examples please. Sounds like more projection of what the left wants to do. January 6th meant nothing to you? That’s not normal FYI.
|
|
augustwest
Full Member
Posts: 1,853
Member is Online
|
Post by augustwest on Apr 16, 2024 23:08:45 GMT -5
If we are stupid enough to let this wanna be dictator back in power he will work to cause unrest so that he can suspend the constitution. Bank on it. Not sure he can pull it off but that will be his goal. Where has he ever given any serious indication he would do anything like that? Examples please. Sounds like more projection of what the left wants to do. apnews.com/article/social-media-donald-trump-8e6e2f0a092135428c82c0cfa6598444Trump, who announced last month that he is running again for president, made the claim over the weekend on his Truth Social media platform. “A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution,” he wrote. “Our great ‘Founders’ did not want, and would not condone, False & Fraudulent Elections!”
|
|
augustwest
Full Member
Posts: 1,853
Member is Online
|
Post by augustwest on Apr 16, 2024 23:11:57 GMT -5
If we are stupid enough to let this wanna be dictator back in power he will work to cause unrest so that he can suspend the constitution. Bank on it. Not sure he can pull it off but that will be his goal. Where has he ever given any serious indication he would do anything like that? Examples please. Sounds like more projection of what the left wants to do. thehill.com/homenews/administration/376097-trump-take-the-guns-first-go-through-due-process-second/amp/President Trump on Wednesday voiced support for confiscating guns from certain individuals deemed to be dangerous, even if it violates due process rights. Had Biden said this it would be on Fox and NewsMax (Facts Less) 247
|
|
|
Post by Ranger John on Apr 17, 2024 2:51:49 GMT -5
You do know what the tag lines in all of your posts say right? You know the "For my friends (the Bidens, the Squad) everything, for Trump and everyone who supports him, there is the law." You don't even know you're a self-parody, do you? Is that why Biden hasn't interfered in Hunter's harassment? Gaslighting is way too lazy. Do the work. Biden hasn't interfered with Hunter's harassment because he has the FBI to do that for him. The FBI is trying to only do the bare minimum it needs to do to save its credibility, and it isn't even managing to do that.
|
|
|
Post by pickle20 on Apr 17, 2024 6:27:22 GMT -5
Kinda feels like that’s what republicans have been doing with Hunter Biden. And Joe too. The left always accuses the right of doing what they are actually doing. The republicans don't control the DOJ or FBI. LOL, I feel the same about the right. Every accusation is a confession. Especially since Trump. Republicans do control the house and have wasted god knows how much time and energy going after the Bidens and coming up empty. Even getting made to look like fools for falling for Russian stooges.
|
|
|
Post by smokey1 on Apr 17, 2024 9:35:55 GMT -5
Where has he ever given any serious indication he would do anything like that? Examples please. Sounds like more projection of what the left wants to do. January 6th meant nothing to you? That’s not normal FYI. It was a mostly peaceful protest that was certainly less violent and destructive than the multitude of riots from BLM and Antifa. It was not an attempt to take over the government. That's what it meant to me.
|
|
|
Post by upstream on Apr 17, 2024 9:38:11 GMT -5
January 6th meant nothing to you? That’s not normal FYI. It was a mostly peaceful protest that was certainly less violent and destructive than the multitude of riots from BLM and Antifa. It was not an attempt to take over the government. That's what it meant to me. And Obama was a racist and Trump isn’t ? I’m just trying to gauge your butter finger grasp on reality…
|
|
|
Post by pickle20 on Apr 17, 2024 9:43:41 GMT -5
January 6th meant nothing to you? That’s not normal FYI. It was a mostly peaceful protest that was certainly less violent and destructive than the multitude of riots from BLM and Antifa. It was not an attempt to take over the government. That's what it meant to me. Here's what it meant to me, and is a lot more closer to the truth: It was a violent protest, where over 140 police officers were wounded, as many as 5 died as a result of that day, at least 2 rioters were killed, and they attempted to disrupt the peaceful transfer of power. The George Floyd riots, which saw violence and destruction from people from the left and the right, has nothing to do with 1/6. Bringing it up is a deflection tactic.
|
|
|
Post by smokey1 on Apr 17, 2024 9:58:09 GMT -5
It was a mostly peaceful protest that was certainly less violent and destructive than the multitude of riots from BLM and Antifa. It was not an attempt to take over the government. That's what it meant to me. Here's what it meant to me, and is a lot more closer to the truth: It was a violent protest, where over 140 police officers were wounded, as many as 5 died as a result of that day, at least 2 rioters were killed, and they attempted to disrupt the peaceful transfer of power. The George Floyd riots, which saw violence and destruction from people from the left and the right, has nothing to do with 1/6. Bringing it up is a deflection tactic. The videos from inside the Capital building don't show that at all. Your claims of wounded police officers and those killed are disputed.
|
|
|
Post by JoyinMudville on Apr 17, 2024 10:03:22 GMT -5
January 6th meant nothing to you? That’s not normal FYI. It was a mostly peaceful protest that was certainly less violent and destructive than the multitude of riots from BLM and Antifa. It was not an attempt to take over the government. That's what it meant to me. Their stated purpose was to prevent the duly elected president from assuming office. It was the first time in our almost 250 year history that we didn't have a peaceful transition of power. Those are facts. What it 'means' to cultists like you is irrelevant.
|
|
|
Post by JoyinMudville on Apr 17, 2024 10:04:15 GMT -5
Here's what it meant to me, and is a lot more closer to the truth: It was a violent protest, where over 140 police officers were wounded, as many as 5 died as a result of that day, at least 2 rioters were killed, and they attempted to disrupt the peaceful transfer of power. The George Floyd riots, which saw violence and destruction from people from the left and the right, has nothing to do with 1/6. Bringing it up is a deflection tactic. The videos from inside the Capital building don't show that at all. Your claims of wounded police officers and those killed are disputed. You are lying www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2021/12/24/january-6-video-capitol-riot-schneider-ath-vpx.cnn
|
|
|
Post by JoyinMudville on Apr 17, 2024 10:07:26 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by upstream on Apr 17, 2024 10:07:52 GMT -5
We know he's lying, but the crazy thing is I don't think he does.
|
|
|
Post by JoyinMudville on Apr 17, 2024 10:10:02 GMT -5
We know he's lying, but the crazy thing is I don't think he does.
|
|
|
Post by ivanbalt on Apr 17, 2024 10:12:45 GMT -5
We know he's lying, but the crazy thing is I don't think he does. In his mind the confederacy is the only recognized government so the delusions go far.
|
|
|
Post by JoyinMudville on Apr 17, 2024 10:23:03 GMT -5
Only day 2 and Trump got admonished by the judge for attempting to intimidate a prospective member of the jury.
A narcissistic like Trump is going to continue to struggle in a situation where people aren't constantly blowing sunshine up his butt.
|
|
|
Post by pickle20 on Apr 17, 2024 10:24:49 GMT -5
Here's what it meant to me, and is a lot more closer to the truth: It was a violent protest, where over 140 police officers were wounded, as many as 5 died as a result of that day, at least 2 rioters were killed, and they attempted to disrupt the peaceful transfer of power. The George Floyd riots, which saw violence and destruction from people from the left and the right, has nothing to do with 1/6. Bringing it up is a deflection tactic. The videos from inside the Capital building don't show that at all. Your claims of wounded police officers and those killed are disputed. You mean the video of a protestor getting shot for bashing down a door to get at members of Congress? You sure do have a selective memory. I thought we were supposed to trust and believe the police, right? Police union says 140 officers injured in Capitol riot
|
|
|
Post by smokey1 on Apr 17, 2024 10:46:54 GMT -5
Where's the lie? An opinion can't be a lie and its no lie those claims are disputed.
|
|
|
Post by JoyinMudville on Apr 17, 2024 10:52:05 GMT -5
Where's the lie? An opinion can't be a lie and it's no lie those claims are disputed. The videos do show violence. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion but everyone is not entitled to their own facts. You're lying
|
|
|
Post by pickle20 on Apr 17, 2024 12:11:48 GMT -5
Smokey is having his own "firey but mostly peaceful" moment.
|
|
|
Post by smokey1 on Apr 17, 2024 13:16:08 GMT -5
Where's the lie? An opinion can't be a lie and it's no lie those claims are disputed. The videos do show violence. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion but everyone is not entitled to their own facts. You're lying Again where is the lie? Are you so ignorant that you believe opinions can be lies? No surprise. There are some saying FBI plants were there trying to start violence.
|
|
|
Post by smokey1 on Apr 17, 2024 13:16:49 GMT -5
Smokey is having his own "firey but mostly peaceful" moment. Yes, those FBI plants did a good job.
|
|
|
Post by pickle20 on Apr 17, 2024 13:32:42 GMT -5
Smokey is having his own "firey but mostly peaceful" moment. Yes, those FBI plants did a good job. Sounds like another wild, unfounded right-wing conspiracy theory. You must be smoking some strong stuff. Where is the evidence to support this claim? I know there is evidence from social media and texts that various right-wing groups and participants were planning to do what they did on 1/6.
|
|
|
Post by JoyinMudville on Apr 17, 2024 13:38:56 GMT -5
The videos do show violence. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion but everyone is not entitled to their own facts. You're lying Again where is the lie? Are you so ignorant that you believe opinions can be lies? No surprise. No, I understand that there are these things called 'facts' and that you are lying. The factual evidence showing violence on January 6th is voluminous. Your statements to the contrary are lies and that makes you a liar.
|
|
|
Post by smokey1 on Apr 17, 2024 14:30:59 GMT -5
Again where is the lie? Are you so ignorant that you believe opinions can be lies? No surprise. No, I understand that there are these things called 'facts' and that you are lying. The factual evidence showing violence on January 6th is voluminous. Your statements to the contrary are lies and that makes you a liar. Where did I make a statement of fact? You are the liar.
|
|
|
Post by smokey1 on Apr 17, 2024 14:32:18 GMT -5
Yes, those FBI plants did a good job. Sounds like another wild, unfounded right-wing conspiracy theory. You must be smoking some strong stuff. Where is the evidence to support this claim? I know there is evidence from social media and texts that various right-wing groups and participants were planning to do what they did on 1/6. Then where is your evidence?
|
|