|
Post by kandace on Aug 31, 2020 14:29:41 GMT -5
of Caucasian SupremacyThis thread is needed now more than ever. 'Nuff said.
|
|
|
Post by vosa on Sept 1, 2020 12:12:30 GMT -5
of Caucasian SupremacyThis thread is needed now more than ever. 'Nuff said. I wonder if this will be race related.
|
|
|
Post by kandace on Sept 1, 2020 12:13:20 GMT -5
of Caucasian SupremacyThis thread is needed now more than ever. 'Nuff said. I wonder if this will be race related.
|
|
|
Post by guido2 on Sept 1, 2020 15:12:40 GMT -5
As an ol' white guy that has gone through decades of 'whitism', raceism, feminism, etc. and have paid some price in every decade..... be it dating or job promotions. I give it all to 'you'. Tell you what.....wave a wand that makes only non-whites and females are in charge. From top to bottom. From industry to politics. And don't expect me to pay taxes and so on to support all the 'others'. And I am a happy camper. I do my bit.... I treat everyone as equals till they prove otherwise. I support when proper and don't when not. I have done everything I can to try and accomidate and respect non-whites and females and trans whatevers for a long time now. And we Caucasians.....are all lumped together. So................................ I officially put you 'others' in charge of stuff that I ...even as a 'privileged' white male never had one iota of influence in to fixing it. Here is the baton.... now leave me the blip alone.
|
|
|
Post by vosa on Sept 2, 2020 13:46:20 GMT -5
As an ol' white guy that has gone through decades of 'whitism', raceism, feminism, etc. and have paid some price in every decade..... be it dating or job promotions. I give it all to 'you'. Tell you what.....wave a wand that makes only non-whites and females are in charge. From top to bottom. From industry to politics. And don't expect me to pay taxes and so on to support all the 'others'. And I am a happy camper. I do my bit.... I treat everyone as equals till they prove otherwise. I support when proper and don't when not. I have done everything I can to try and accomidate and respect non-whites and females and trans whatevers for a long time now. And we Caucasians.....are all lumped together. So................................ I officially put you 'others' in charge of stuff that I ...even as a 'privileged' white male never had one iota of influence in to fixing it. Here is the baton.... now leave me the blip alone. How you've lived your life counts for squat. You will obey and you will pay.
|
|
|
Post by guido2 on Sept 3, 2020 9:13:48 GMT -5
As an ol' white guy that has gone through decades of 'whitism', raceism, feminism, etc. and have paid some price in every decade..... be it dating or job promotions. I give it all to 'you'. Tell you what.....wave a wand that makes only non-whites and females are in charge. From top to bottom. From industry to politics. And don't expect me to pay taxes and so on to support all the 'others'. And I am a happy camper. I do my bit.... I treat everyone as equals till they prove otherwise. I support when proper and don't when not. I have done everything I can to try and accomidate and respect non-whites and females and trans whatevers for a long time now. And we Caucasians.....are all lumped together. So................................ I officially put you 'others' in charge of stuff that I ...even as a 'privileged' white male never had one iota of influence in to fixing it. Here is the baton.... now leave me the blip alone. How you've lived your life counts for squat. You will obey and you will pay. I don't know how much more obeying or paying I can do beyond what I have already done. If someone can articulate what can additionally be expected I'd be happy to hear it.
|
|
|
Post by vosa on Sept 3, 2020 13:38:10 GMT -5
How you've lived your life counts for squat. You will obey and you will pay. I don't know how much more obeying or paying I can do beyond what I have already done. If someone can articulate what can additionally be expected I'd be happy to hear it. Well for openers who do you think is going to pay for the Green New Deal?
|
|
|
Post by stevez51 on Sept 3, 2020 13:41:36 GMT -5
I don't know how much more obeying or paying I can do beyond what I have already done. If someone can articulate what can additionally be expected I'd be happy to hear it. Well for openers who do you think is going to pay for the Green New Deal? The Caucasian Supremacists ........ Get with the program man.
|
|
|
Post by vosa on Sept 3, 2020 13:46:30 GMT -5
Well for openers who do you think is going to pay for the Green New Deal? The Caucasian Supremacists ........ Get with the program man. Then shouldn't it be called the White New Deal?
|
|
|
Post by stevez51 on Sept 3, 2020 14:35:46 GMT -5
The Caucasian Supremacists ........ Get with the program man. Then shouldn't it be called the White New Deal? Could. All New Deal might stir up some trouble ......
|
|
|
Post by kandace on Sept 6, 2020 11:35:00 GMT -5
The Polish Legions In Haiti (1802-1805) The Haitian revolution was arguably one of the most influential revolutions in world history. It set the stage for the independence of most of Latin America, as free Haiti provided invaluable assistance to the Latin American Liberator Simon Bolivar. By crippling France's foothold in the Western Hemisphere, it induced Napoleon to sell his claim on the land in the heart of the Mississippi Valley to the then upstart nation, the US of A, doubling America's size literally overnight, setting the stage for that nation's dominance of crucial waterways that would make it a continental power able to expand westward. And the Haitian Revolution prompted America's Founding Fathers to halt the importation of slaves after 1808. And also to lobby furiously for the abolition of slavery in the northern US and against its extension into the NW Territories. Yet, for all of the ink that has been spilled analyzing the Haitian revolution and its numerous phases, plots, counter-plots, and after-effects, one aspect of the Haitian revolution is mostly overlooked: the role of Polish Deserters who fought on the side of the Haitians. From the 1770 through the early 1800s, Poland was partitioned and slowly but steadily fell under the control of Austria, Prussia, and Prussia. Large numbers of Polish soldiers, who gained experience fighting a losing battle against ever encroaching invaders, served in the army of Napoleon. In 1802, Napoleon, desperate for cash to fund his wars, enraged at the though of those uppity Africans (not that he called them that) winning their freedom from French slaveholders, and just plain ticked off because there were Black generals in his army who were sexier than he was (it often comes back to that, doesn't it?) launched an invasion of Haiti with over 5,000 Polish soldiers to re-enslave the embattled populace. Once the Polish regiment arrived, it was fiercely attacked by malaria, yellow fever, and Haitians desperate to maintain their freedom. uzar.files.wordpress.com/2010/01/san_domingo.jpgBattle at San Domingo
Yet, as they fought the Haitians, it dawned on many Poles that they, a people who lost their homeland, should not fight to re-enslave a people fighting for their freedom. So, hundreds of Poles defected, and began to fight alongside the Haitians. (The fact that Haitian were also Catholic arguably influenced them). Many Poles died in defense of Haitian freedom. Once the war was over, 400 Polish soldiers remained in haiti, settling in their own little villages, inter-marrying with Haitian women, and becoming, along with neutral Germans, officially "Black" under Haitian law. Their descendants remain in Haiti to this day: farm5.staticflickr.com/4127/4831666684_4aaf9f0b6d_o.jpg2.bp.blogspot.com/-_FR7ANEivJM/S3GZRM2D1CI/AAAAAAAADTA/c_0Af0lB7vw/s1600/Polish+descendants+in+Haiti..jpgWhen Pope John Paul II visited Haiti in 1983, he mentioned the role of Poles in fighting for Haiti's freedom, and met with Polish-Haitians.
|
|
|
Post by kandace on Sept 7, 2020 13:44:38 GMT -5
Nathaniel Appleton was born into a line of sturdy Puritan new England stock. His uncle John Leverett was president of Harvard. Harvard was also Appleton's alma mater. Appleton was minister of the First Church in Cambridge for sixty-six years. Being an ordained minister did not divorce Appleton from the whirlpool of socio-political unrest that characterized late colonial/early Revolutionary America. Appleton wads an ardent opponent of the Colonial Stamp Ac. His sermon expressing thanks for the repeal of the Stamp Acts is one of the great classics of early American sermons. Rev. Appleton opened his meeting house to colonial (soon to be Revolutionary) soldiers. Washington and his soldiers worshipped there. The Constitution of Massachusetts was framed there in 1779.
However, unlike many of his contemporaries, Rev. Appleton did not loudly proclaim hiss desire for liberty while supporting the bondage of others. He was a fervent opponent of the enslavement of African peoples, and penned a widely read polemic, Considerations On Slavery, In A letter To A Friend, as both a letter to seek to dissuade an acquaintance from participating in the slave trade as well as public polemic aagainst the oppression of Africans that was rampant in his society. Here are a few excerpts:
[NOTE: I am dividing these very long three original paragraphs into smaller, easier to read segments for modern audiences. These were originally three paragraphs so please do not think the three paragraph rule was violated. I am dividing the originals for the sake of readability]
Before I enter upon the arguments for and against the trade, permit me to contrast a Briton and a negro slave in America, neither chargeable with any crime cognizable by the public—A Briton has the free dispo|sal of his time, to employ it in that way he likes best; all he gains by his industry, he hath sole right to; none of it can be taken from him, but by his consent; he may marry, no man can seperate him from the ob|ject of his affections; his house is his castle; none (un|less he has made himself obnoxious to the public) may intrude upon him. Happy Briton!
The slave has neither command of his time, nor choice of his em|ploy; must labour incessantly during his master's pleasure; can make no claim to the produce of his own industry; a bare subsistance is all he receives; and tho' he has labour'd 20 years, and earn'd his master an estate, yet even then he is liable to be sold, and of|ten is, for want of employ, or for fear that in his old age he should be a burthen upon the wealthy heirs. He can't marry, because marriage is founded on promise, and slaves can promise nothing. They are indeed, sometimes, to please them, indulged a sham-marriage, which is dissolved again at the master's will, without consulting the slaves' inclination. He is sold out of the country, and so shifted from hand to hand (if he lives to be old) 'till he is a burthen, and wished out of life to save expence. Shocking contrast!
This trade for the lives of men being once established, has set all Africa by the ears; all honest industry among them is laid aside for the more profitable business of trapaning one ano|ther; all common confidence is destroyed; and indeed their natural affections are very much weaken'd by their immoderate fondness for our luxuries *—Pray Sir, is not this inhumane in us?—
But further, I find by the accounts of that trade, that when a powerful black Prince has collected by force or artifice a num|ber of his colour, they are offer'd to the whites for sale; then an inspector, perhaps a physician, is em|ploy'd by the purchasers to view the slaves, who are stripped of every rag which modesty had procured, ana male and female handled in a manner not to be related, to select the sound in wind and limb: in their choice they pay no regard to former connections, hus|band and wife are parted, parents and children are se|perated, the weakly wife will not be taken to accom|pany the healthy husband.
By the importation of black slaves, we prevent the importation of white servants; and it is well known that there are thousands in Europe, who would gladly come among us, and might be brought here for a quar|ter the cost of a black man: these white people would do all the labour for us, that we have any right to re|ceive from others; those that cannot pay a passage, must doubtless sell part of their time for it; after that is ex|pired, they can let themselves as servants at as low a rate as a negro can be maintained, reckoning his cost, the risque of his life, &c. . .
These white people when they have served some years in the lowest capacities, turn out upon our waste-lands, marry and in a few years we see a Town well settled; and in less than fifty years, there will be four fold increase: by this means our country will fill up, we become respectable, and secure from an enemy, and furnished with every conveniency of life: Tho' it has been plead, that prohibiting the impor|tation of slaves, would cut off a large branch of trade, yet it must be remembered that upon the whole, it is an unprofitable one for the community, because real riches (if rum may be called so) are sent from this place for an article which we either might have from among ourselves, or we might import with little or no expor|tation; and tho' individuals may make a good advance upon their stock, yet the riches are wholly got from ourselves, a trade which you well know Sir, is always esteem'd disadvantageous to a community.
I take it to be the policy of a state to consult measures to have the greatest number of laborers, and those so interested in the welfare of the community, as to be always de|sirous and ready to support and defend it: But how con|trary to all this is the policy of suffering the importati|on of a sett of people, which at best puts a gain into the pockets of but a few men, and indulges the vani|ty and haughty tempers of a few more; instead of being a defence and support of the common wealth, are often its terror, and sometimes its destruction: For it must be constantly expected that a slave will improve every opportunity to throw off his burthen, and impo|sition:
New-York, & most of the Southern colonies, and West-Indies, have experienced something of that, which is enough to make all those that set a just value upon domestic security, to tremble: it has been objected that their numbers are at present so inconsiderable, that no|thing of that can be feared. I grant it for the present . . .
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 7, 2020 14:53:30 GMT -5
The Polish Legions In Haiti (1802-1805) The Haitian revolution was arguably one of the most influential revolutions in world history. It set the stage for the independence of most of Latin America, as free Haiti provided invaluable assistance to the Latin American Liberator Simon Bolivar. By crippling France's foothold in the Western Hemisphere, it induced Napoleon to sell his claim on the land in the heart of the Mississippi Valley to the then upstart nation, the US of A, doubling America's size literally overnight, setting the stage for that nation's dominance of crucial waterways that would make it a continental power able to expand westward. And the Haitian Revolution prompted America's Founding Fathers to halt the importation of slaves after 1808. And also to lobby furiously for the abolition of slavery in the northern US and against its extension into the NW Territories. Yet, for all of the ink that has been spilled analyzing the Haitian revolution and its numerous phases, plots, counter-plots, and after-effects, one aspect of the Haitian revolution is mostly overlooked: the role of Polish Deserters who fought on the side of the Haitians. From the 1770 through the early 1800s, Poland was partitioned and slowly but steadily fell under the control of Austria, Prussia, and Prussia. Large numbers of Polish soldiers, who gained experience fighting a losing battle against ever encroaching invaders, served in the army of Napoleon. In 1802, Napoleon, desperate for cash to fund his wars, enraged at the though of those uppity Africans (not that he called them that) winning their freedom from French slaveholders, and just plain ticked off because there were Black generals in his army who were sexier than he was (it often comes back to that, doesn't it?) launched an invasion of Haiti with over 5,000 Polish soldiers to re-enslave the embattled populace. Once the Polish regiment arrived, it was fiercely attacked by malaria, yellow fever, and Haitians desperate to maintain their freedom. uzar.files.wordpress.com/2010/01/san_domingo.jpgBattle at San Domingo
Yet, as they fought the Haitians, it dawned on many Poles that they, a people who lost their homeland, should not fight to re-enslave a people fighting for their freedom. So, hundreds of Poles defected, and began to fight alongside the Haitians. (The fact that Haitian were also Catholic arguably influenced them). Many Poles died in defense of Haitian freedom. Once the war was over, 400 Polish soldiers remained in haiti, settling in their own little villages, inter-marrying with Haitian women, and becoming, along with neutral Germans, officially "Black" under Haitian law. Their descendants remain in Haiti to this day: farm5.staticflickr.com/4127/4831666684_4aaf9f0b6d_o.jpg2.bp.blogspot.com/-_FR7ANEivJM/S3GZRM2D1CI/AAAAAAAADTA/c_0Af0lB7vw/s1600/Polish+descendants+in+Haiti..jpgWhen Pope John Paul II visited Haiti in 1983, he mentioned the role of Poles in fighting for Haiti's freedom, and met with Polish-Haitians. So the author would have us believe that the French sold millions of acres in a river basin because they lost Haiti? I'm hard pressed to accept that as anything other than conjecture. Cool work by the Poles though.
|
|
|
Post by kandace on Sept 7, 2020 19:01:32 GMT -5
The Polish Legions In Haiti (1802-1805) The Haitian revolution was arguably one of the most influential revolutions in world history. It set the stage for the independence of most of Latin America, as free Haiti provided invaluable assistance to the Latin American Liberator Simon Bolivar. By crippling France's foothold in the Western Hemisphere, it induced Napoleon to sell his claim on the land in the heart of the Mississippi Valley to the then upstart nation, the US of A, doubling America's size literally overnight, setting the stage for that nation's dominance of crucial waterways that would make it a continental power able to expand westward. And the Haitian Revolution prompted America's Founding Fathers to halt the importation of slaves after 1808. And also to lobby furiously for the abolition of slavery in the northern US and against its extension into the NW Territories. Yet, for all of the ink that has been spilled analyzing the Haitian revolution and its numerous phases, plots, counter-plots, and after-effects, one aspect of the Haitian revolution is mostly overlooked: the role of Polish Deserters who fought on the side of the Haitians. From the 1770 through the early 1800s, Poland was partitioned and slowly but steadily fell under the control of Austria, Prussia, and Prussia. Large numbers of Polish soldiers, who gained experience fighting a losing battle against ever encroaching invaders, served in the army of Napoleon. In 1802, Napoleon, desperate for cash to fund his wars, enraged at the though of those uppity Africans (not that he called them that) winning their freedom from French slaveholders, and just plain ticked off because there were Black generals in his army who were sexier than he was (it often comes back to that, doesn't it?) launched an invasion of Haiti with over 5,000 Polish soldiers to re-enslave the embattled populace. Once the Polish regiment arrived, it was fiercely attacked by malaria, yellow fever, and Haitians desperate to maintain their freedom. uzar.files.wordpress.com/2010/01/san_domingo.jpgBattle at San Domingo
Yet, as they fought the Haitians, it dawned on many Poles that they, a people who lost their homeland, should not fight to re-enslave a people fighting for their freedom. So, hundreds of Poles defected, and began to fight alongside the Haitians. (The fact that Haitian were also Catholic arguably influenced them). Many Poles died in defense of Haitian freedom. Once the war was over, 400 Polish soldiers remained in haiti, settling in their own little villages, inter-marrying with Haitian women, and becoming, along with neutral Germans, officially "Black" under Haitian law. Their descendants remain in Haiti to this day: farm5.staticflickr.com/4127/4831666684_4aaf9f0b6d_o.jpg2.bp.blogspot.com/-_FR7ANEivJM/S3GZRM2D1CI/AAAAAAAADTA/c_0Af0lB7vw/s1600/Polish+descendants+in+Haiti..jpgWhen Pope John Paul II visited Haiti in 1983, he mentioned the role of Poles in fighting for Haiti's freedom, and met with Polish-Haitians. So the author would have us believe that the French sold millions of acres in a river basin because they lost Haiti? I'm hard pressed to accept that as anything other than conjecture. Cool work by the Poles though. The Louisiana Territorial Claim that France obtained from Spain was heavily dependent upon French control of Haiti. Roughly 40 percent of Great Britain and France’s sugar, and 60 percent of their coffee, was produced in Haiti, via slave labor. Napoleon planned to send troops to secure Louisiana via New Orleans, and establish a lucrative New Orleans-Haiti trade network. The loss of Haiti destroyed this plan, and Napoleon was eager to try to obtain cash somehow as he wouldn't be able to obtain it through the exploitation of slave Haitian labor. So, Napoleon approached the US of A about selling the Louisiana Claim. Thomas Jefferson, who wasn't worried about a declining Spain having a presence in the Louisiana region, but was understandably nervous about a hungry France establishing a presence there, was overjoyed to be able to purchase not just the city of New Orleans (The US's original proposal to France, not the entire territory) but all of the Louisiana Territory. So, yes, Haiti was pivotal in Napoleon's sale of the Louisiana Territorial Claim, that is fact, not just mere conjecture. Of course, France greatly regretted its loss of a presence on the North American continent. That's why France tried to re-enter Continental North America by invading Mexico in 1861. Fortunately for the US of A, the Mexicans were able to defeat the French and regain their independence. France's inability to maintain a continental presence in the Western hemisphere, led to its slow, but steady decline, as the same dynamic had for Spain and Portugal. Granted, France had colonies in Africa and then in Vietnam to buttress it, but that just made the decline slower, it did not stop it.
|
|
|
Post by kandace on Sept 8, 2020 23:04:14 GMT -5
Elihu Embree (1782-1820) The Haitian Revolution produced two contradictory trends concerning the institution of African Racial Chattel Slavery. First, it produced a surge of radical abolitionism in Latin America as well as gradual emancipation in the British controlled West Indies. Simon Bolivar, the Great Liberator of Latin America from Spanish domination, received valuable assistance from Haiti on the condition that he abolish slavery in his new republic of Great Columbia (Columbia, Venezuela, Peru, Bolivia, Chile). The shockwaves of Haitian independence were felt in Mexico, where the people were inspired to rebel and overthrow three centuries of Spanish rule. Mexico in turn abolished slavery. Second, the Haitian revolution, led as it was by enslaved Africans still a generation or two removed from Africa and familiar with African military tactics, convinced Great Britain that Africans should no longer be imported to the West Indies. The loss of Haiti to the global sugar market produced a void, one that was filled by the newly expanded USA, which expanded slavery through its newly acquired Louisiana Territory. It was into this world of expanding slavery that Elihu Embree was born. The son of a Quaker minister, Thomas Embrue, Elihu and his family moved from Pennsylvania to the region that would become Tennessee in 1790. Elihu and his brother Elijah became the region’s earliest and most prominent iron manufacturers. Like many of the commercially up and coming merchant class of his society, Elihu was a slave owner. However, at the age of 30, Elihu had an epiphany which caused him to became an ardent abolitionist. He became a leader in the Manumission Society of Tennessee, first organized in Greene County in 1815 under the leadership of Charles Osborn and John Rankin. In April 1820 Elihu began publishing The Emancipator, the first publication in the United States devoted exclusively to the antislavery cause. Elihu railed ferociously against the institution of slavery, , calling slaveholders “monsters in human flesh,” and denouncing the Missouri Compromise with the demand “Not another foot of slave territory!” Slavery, he argued repeatedly in the pages of his popular newspaper, “is a shame to any people,” and “freedom is the inalienable right of all men.” It was only his untimely death from bilious fever Although his untimely death in 1820 of bilious fever that prevented him from being numbered among the nation's most prominent abolitionists.
|
|
|
Post by vosa on Sept 9, 2020 13:24:24 GMT -5
of Caucasian SupremacyThis thread is needed now more than ever. 'Nuff said. I wonder if this will be race related. I wonder no more. I never really did in the first place.
|
|
|
Post by Rael on Sept 9, 2020 13:39:33 GMT -5
Can I get a link to this assertion?
|
|
|
Post by kandace on Sept 9, 2020 19:17:52 GMT -5
Can I get a link to this assertion?
As to all three men's attractiveness, well, that is conjectuaral trash talking, with the exception of Dumas.
Napoleon, did not take that well. But, in all fairness, who would. Dumas was suave, smooth, tall, basically, everything Napoleon wished he were, physically (Well, with the exception of being Black. No Caucasian wants that).
You know the arrogant, authority bucking, trash-talking wiseguy hero ( or sometimes anti-hero) who often graces our novels, movies, and tv's? That was Thomas A. Dumas in real life. His son, Alexander Dumas, the author of Count of Monte Cristo and The Three Musketeers, no doubt wove much of his father's personality into his protagonists.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 10, 2020 9:13:43 GMT -5
Can I get a link to this assertion?
As to all three men's attractiveness, well, that is conjectuaral trash talking, with the exception of Dumas.
Napoleon, did not take that well. But, in all fairness, who would. Dumas was suave, smooth, tall, basically, everything Napoleon wished he were, physically (Well, with the exception of being Black. No Caucasian wants that).
You know the arrogant, authority bucking, trash-talking wiseguy hero ( or sometimes anti-hero) who often graces our novels, movies, and tv's? That was Thomas A. Dumas in real life. His son, Alexander Dumas, the author of Count of Monte Cristo and The Three Musketeers, no doubt wove much of his father's personality into his protagonists.
See Jessica Krug, Rachel Donezal.
|
|
|
Post by kandace on Sept 10, 2020 21:11:03 GMT -5
William Murray was a scion of the Scottish aristocracy, son of the 5th Viscount Stormont. His family were staunch supporters of the Jacobite cause, one of the great lost causes. This perhaps instilled in Murray a subliminal sympathy for the underdog. Murray followed the usual educational course of a man of his station, receiving grammar education at Perth, higher education at Westminster School and Christ Church, Oxford. While at Oford he became immersed in ancient history and languages, becoming fluent enough in Latin to translate works of Cicero from Latin to English and back again. His Latin fluency suited him well in obtaining ga deep understanding of Roman law. He also became fluent in French, the language of European high culture and diplomacy. He established a legal practice in Scotland, yet the bar in Scotland was so crowded that he was forced to seek his fortunes in England. He was called to the bar at Lincoln's Inn in 1730, and soon slowly established a legal practice. In 1737, Murray defended the city of Edinburgh against Parliamentary mandated disenfranchisement (it was for the murder of an English official) Murray represented the city before the House of Commons and the House of Lords, and succeeded in reducing the city's punishment to a fine the disqualification of its Provost. The citizens of Edinburgh award Murray with a diamond that remains in custody of his family to this very day. This victory greatly boosted his reputation and in 1738 he was involved in 11 of 16 cases heard before the House of Lords, and in 1739 and 1740 he acted as legal counsel for 30 cases there. Murray married Lady Elizabeth Finch, the daughter of Daniel Finch, 2nd Earl of Nottingham. The Mansfields did not have children but took on care of their niece, Lady Elizabeth Murray, in the wake of her mother's death. In 1765 Mansfield's nephew Captain Sir John Lindsay returned to Britain from his assignment in the West Indies and brought his natural daughter Elizabeth the daughter of Maria Bell, an enslaved woman. Lindsay asked Murray to take on her care and education, and Elizabeth was baptized Dido Elizabeth Belle in 1766 in London.
Mansfield was sympathetic to the right of conscience. When a Catholic priest was charged with breaking the law by saying a Mass, Mansfield charged the jury in such a manner that his conviction was impossible and he was acquitted. This triggered riots. Murray acquitted the leader of an anti-Catholic mob that set fire to his own house and library during the riots. When an elderly woman was accused of using witchcraft to fly through the air, Murray ruled that the woman should be allowed to return home, and if she did so by flying, no law prevented that. Mansfield's most famous ruling however, was his 1772 ruling in the case of James Somerset vs. His Master, Mr. Stewart of Virginia which effectively ended the institution of slavery in England (albeit not in British colonies.) "The state of slavery is … so odious that nothing can be suffered to support it," Murray wrote in his opinion. It was a masterful use of cultural snobbery and xenophobia in the service of liberating the downtrodden.
The ruling was not as comprehensive as many hoped. In practice it merely prohibited slave owners from forcefully sending their slaves back to the Caribbean, but the way that it was received marked a significant milestone along the long road towards the abolition of the transatlantic slave trade in 1807. As could be expected, Mansfield's ruling were not popular in his day. he was denounced as what we would call an "activist judge." Slaveholders keenly discerned the precedent that was being set, and seethed in rage, particularly in the British North American colonies that would become the US of A.
His ruling in Somerset was especially reviled, with slaveholders in America grumbling that his affection for his uppity negress niece (who somehow had seized control of his whole household) had clouded his mind and caused to rule on emotion alone.
[sigh] The more things change . . .
|
|
|
Post by kandace on Sept 11, 2020 21:29:32 GMT -5
J ohn Jay (1745-1829) John Jay was an illustrious Founding Father of the United States. He served as President of the Second Continental Congress from 1778 to 1779. He served as Minister to Spain from 1779 to 1782, securing vital financial support form the Spanish Crown for the then shaky cause of American Independence. He negotiated and signed the Treaty of Paris of 1783, which official ended the American War of Independence. From 1784 to 1789, Jay served as Secretary of Foreign Affairs for the fledging American Confederacy. While Jay did not attend the Constitutional Convention (Well, he had earned his rest), he forcefully advocated for the establishment of a stronger central government. Upon the creation of the federal United States of America under the Constitution, he was appointed Chief Justice of the new Supreme Court, on which he served from 1789 to 1794. Upon leaving Court (yes, Justices used to do that), Jay was elected as the second Governor of New York, which office he occupied from 1795 to 1801. John Jay was, like many Founding Fathers, a great Walking Contradiction. He was an ardent champion of Liberty and an ardent slaveholder. Like other Founding fathers, he recognized this contradiction. Unlike many other Founding Fathers, je actually did a great deal to abolish the institution of African Chattel Slavery where he could, in the state of New York. Early in his career, J ay was a very public advocate of Abolition. In his 1774 Address to the People of Great Britain, Jay declared: Friends and Fellow-Subjects: When a Nation, lead to greatness by the hand of Liberty, and possessed of all the Glory that heroism, munificence, and humanity can bestow, descends to the ungrateful task of forging chains for her friends and children, and instead of giving support to Freedom, turns advocate for Slavery and Oppression, there is reason to suspect she has either ceased to be virtuous, or been extremely negligent in the appointment of her Rulers. In 1785, Jay founded the New York Manumission Society in 1785, which organized boycotts against newspapers and merchants involved in the slave trade, and provided legal counsel for free blacks claimed or kidnapped as slaves. In 1787, the Manumission Society founded the African Free School, which evolved into a system of several schools dedicated to the education of free African youth. The alumni of the Free African School System includes a Who's Who list of prominent free AAs in the mid 19th century: Dr. James McCune Smith, the first African American to earn a university medical degree and work as a physician; actor Ira Aldridge; Minister Alexander Crummell; educator Charles Lewis Reason; and missionary and educator Alexander Crummell, etc. The Society helped enact the 1799 law for the gradual emancipation of slaves in New York, which Jay signed into law as governor. “An Act for the Gradual Abolition of Slavery” provided that, from July 4 of that year, all children born to slave parents would be free (subject to lengthy apprenticeships) and that slave exports would be prohibited. His sons and grandson went on to become strong advocates of Abolition.
|
|
|
Post by kandace on Sept 12, 2020 18:06:19 GMT -5
Samuel Parker Garrigues (1793-1835) --- Rescuer of the Abducted Many of the persons highlighted in this thread are the type who participated in creating, funding, sustaining, and defending organizations whose names have passed into the historical record with the prominence that attaches to their specialized historical areas. Abolitionist organizations, schools for AAs, legal precedents authored by judges. Yet Samuel Parker Garrigues was an obscure man who undertook what has become in our day an obscure, well-nigh forgotten cause --- liberating free AAs who were abducted from the North and dragged in chains to slavery in the South. The Hollywood Film 12 Years A Slave, loosely based on the slave memoir of the same name, provided a harrowing account of a free AA's abduction and sale into slavery. The contemporary public perception of such abductions was that they were rare and exceptional. The reality, however, was far different. Being sold into slavery was a constant fear of free AAs in the North. Organized gangs of Caucasian men would often fall upon and overpower free AAs, and then sell them into bondage despite their free status. Such abductions were highlighted in abolitionist pamphlets, as shown below: live.staticflickr.com/135/395837427_53c198147f.jpgSamuel P Harrigues was one of the persons who were dedicated to raw cause of rescuing abducted freemen. Samuel P Garrigues was of the Quaker stock that founded the city of Philadelphia. He was born in 1793 and rose to the position of High Constable of the city. The office of High Constable no longer exists in the modern city of brotherly loe, which has a large professional police force. But in the early years of post Independence Philly, the office of High Constable was a prominent post charged with upholding law and order in the city. Philadelphia was a hotbed of anti-slavery sentiment, and it was also the home of the historical African methodist Episcopal Church, founded to enable AAs to worship in peace. These two factors resulted in the growth of a substantial AA free population in Philadelphia. Yet this population became a target for a most nefarious type of predator: professional kidnappers who snatched hapless free AAs and transported them south into bondage. The Constitution's prohibition on importing enslaved Africans, combined with federal legislation, meant that no new sales could legally enter the US after 1808. (Article 1, Section 9 protected importation of enslaved Africans for 20 years only, and prohibited any amendment to the contrary. The Act Prohibiting Importation of Slaves of 1807 (2 Stat. 426) was the federal law which gave teeth to the Constitutional prohibition) However, the spread of cotton gin technology, combined with the expansion of the USA, created a rapacious demand for slave labor that natural increase alone could not satisfy. Hence there arose a massive, well coordinated network of AA kidnappers, in effect a R everse Underground Railroad. In the city of Philadelphia alone, some 100 AA children were abducted within a two year period in the 1820s alone. The AA community lobbied aggressively in the face of the threat, and Philadelphia was one of the few cities in which their pleas were heeded. Mayor Joseph Watson dispatched Samuel Garrigues to the Deep South on several occasions to rescue abducted free AAs. The following excerpts from contemporary newspapers describe Garrigues's missions: It is, we believe, generally known that one of the high constables, Mr. Garrigues, of this city (Philadelphia) was dispatched, some time since, to Mississippi, to take charge of several black children who had been kidnapped from this city and "sold into slavery" in that state. We now learn that Mr. G. has returned with the three children for whom he was sent. He has also discovered in that State, twelve other children, abducted in a similar manner, whom he has caused to be placed in security until he can obtain proper vouchers and formal orders for their redemption. From the 'Republican Compiler' (Gettysburg, Pennsylvania) June 4, 1828. High Constable Garrigues, returned to this city on Tuesday after an absence of nearly three months on his second journey to Mississippi and Louisiana in pursuit of the colored children carried off from Philadelphia in the summer of 1825. Notwithstanding the indefatigable and praiseworthy exertions of this excellent officer, he has on this occasion only been enabled to procure the final discharge and safe return of two of these unfortunate beings – Clem Coxe and E. Laurence, and they too, we learn, after great trouble, risk and expense. From the 'Republican Compiler' (Gettysburg, Pennsylvania) June 4, 1828.
|
|
|
Post by kandace on Sept 13, 2020 13:54:46 GMT -5
Arthur & Lewis Tappan --- (1786/1788-1865/1863) The Tappan Brothers, Arthur & Lewis, were the scions of a large (11 children!) Massachusetts Congregationalist merchant family. As Congregationalists, they were theological heir of the Puritans who founded the Bay Colony nearly a century and a half earlier. Both brothers became prosperous merchants, with Arthur establishing a dry goods business base in Canada and Lewis becoming a dry goods merchant in Philadelphia. The War of 1812 proved a mixed blessing for the Tappans. Arthur was forced to abandon his Canadian business ties while Lewis, taking advantage of the commercial restrictions on british goods, achieved a windfall in business. Both brothers drifted towards New York City, then emerging as the great commercial capital of the young nation, and became stabilized in the import business, particularly the import of silks from China (even then, importing from China was a source of wealth ) The Tappans prospered greatly in this commercial hothouse, and used their wealth to found a newspaper, The New York Journal of Commerce, which refused advertising from "immoral sources." They also were adamant about selling goods at fixed prices rather than based on the willingness and eagerness (or desperation) of customers to pay at various price levels. This practice, originally a Quaker way of doing business that was eventually embraced as a "Christian" way of engaging in commerce. However, for both brothers, wealth was not a means to an end. Rather, not enabled them to fund various philanthropic cases such as temperance, vocational education for the poor, rehabilitation for women trapped in sex trafficking, and abolition. The Tappans' introduction to abolitionism was sparked by a visit in 1830 from William Lloyd Garrison, the eminence anti-slavery crusader of the age. The Tappans were not, as social conscious reformers, ignorant of the evils of African racial chattel slavery. They were among the many influential anti slavery citizens who facilitated the 1828 emancipation of Abdul-Rahman ibn Ibrahima Sori, a Fulani nobleman who had been captured in battle and sold into slavery in Mississippi. Lewis Tappan supported the American Colonization Society, which planned to send free AAs back to Africa. However, Lewis and also Arthur became increasingly frustrated by the steady spread of slavery across the nation, as an institution that many at the time of the founding of the USA assumed would "whither away" (respects to Marx) instead found new life through mechanization of cotton processing through the cotton gin. So the Tappans became radicalized. They supported Garrison's newly founded American Anti-Slavery Society, and Arthur served as its president from 1833 until 1840 (He resigned when it also took up the cause of feminism). When the new college, Oberlin, was founded in Ohio to provide a higher education to AAs at a time when virtually all college education was blocked to them, the taipans were among its most prominent benefactors. The Tappans hit the cause celebre jackpot, so to speak, when the slave ship Amistad, came to US shares after its enslaved passengers staged a slave revolt against their Cuban owners. The Africans were captured and ailed, although eventually freed and allowed to go back to Africa after their case went all the way to the US Supreme Court (and they had former president John Quincy Adams as their defense counsel ) The Tappans' activism did not go unchallenged. Among their most inveterate foes was John Tyler, 10 President of the US of A (1841-1845). John Tyler was a fervent defender of the institution of African Chattel Slavery. In one of his speeches to his flow slaveholders, president Tyler held up an abolitionist publication and declared: "You [slaveholders] are represented as demons in the shape of men; and by way of contrast, here stands [the abolitionists] Arthur Tappan, Mr. Somebody Garrison, or Mr. Foreigner Thompson, patting the greasy little fellows on their cheeks and giving them most lovely kisses."Tyler refereed to the abolitionist literature funded by the Tappans as: "[E]vil," "seditious and incendiary publications."
Tyler further declared that abolitionists such as the Tappans "deserve the deepest curses of the patriot, for having put in jeopardy the noblest and fairest fabric of government the world ever saw. When I think of it, all the milk of my nature is turned into gall."In other words, in the eyes of Tyler and other slaveholders, abolitionists were dangerous radicals, enemies of the people, and just plain un-American for defending the rights of people of African descent. Hmmm. Sounds familiar. Anyway, as could be expected, the Tappans' abolitionist activism created a massive backlash against Arthur and Lewis's business ventures. The Tappan name became synonymous with anti-slavery agitation and many Caucasians in the South as well as the North hated them passionately. Mobs attacked their homes, burned them in effigy throughout the South, and boycotted their business across the nation when possible. The boycott began to take a considerable toll on the Tappans' business. So Lewis made a radical decision. They would tend credit to customers, rather than operate on a cash only business as they had been doing. Why was credit radical? Because the taipans viewed credit as a form of usury, a most unbiblical practice. However, Lewis wondered, what if they just kent money to people who could pay it back? That would not be exploitative. But, how could they know who could be trusted to pay back? To solve this quandary, Lewis created a network of investigators who would examine the background of potential customers. The network supporting Tappan's Mercantile Agency began among fellow members of the abolitionist network but quickly grew to include investigators who, while not abolitionist, did not mind working for a man whose very public profile was highly abolitionist. By 1844, the Tappans had 280 clients and offices in Boston, Philadelphia, Baltimore and New York. Some of their more destined to be famous investigators included Abraham Lincoln and Ulysses S. Grant. Soon, other business men came to the Tappans for advice on who was credit-worthy and who was not. By 1851, the credit reporting agency had 2000 full-time correspondents were reporting from across the nation. In 1858, it became the R.G. Dun & Company business. (In 1933 R.G. Dun & Company would merge with its main rival, Bradstreet, forming Dun & Bradstreet, the largest credit reporting entity in the world). Life, for the Tapppans, was good, as they used their prosperity to support numerous causes dedicated to the uplift of humanity. And when they finally shuffled off their mortal coils, the institution of African Chattel Slavery was on its deathbed. Never let it be said that doing well cannot be done by doing good. )
|
|
|
Post by kandace on Sept 13, 2020 14:01:21 GMT -5
Arthur Tappan's abolitionist activities led to a $20,000 bounty being put for his death or capture by New Orleans slaveholders. Also, Southern mobs often attacked post offices to destroy the abolitionist literature that the Tappan brothers produced and distributed. Here is a Harper's Weekly illustration that juxtaposes these two facts ironically: loc.harpweek.com/LCPoliticalCartoons/Disk7/12w/3b38593v12w.jpgHmmm. Attacking the Post Office to safeguard Caucasian Supremacy. It seem so familiar . . . .
|
|
|
Post by kandace on Sept 17, 2020 20:12:49 GMT -5
Elijah P. Lovejoy (1802-1837) --- Martyr of Abolitionism & Free Press Elijah Lovejoy was born in the early years of the American Republic, descended from the Puritan stock which composed the significant portion of the founding bloodlines of American society. He was a highly intelligent and dedicated pupil, excelling in public schools of Maine and matriculating at Waterville College (now Colby College). He was financially supported by Benjamin Tappan (brother of the abolitionist Tappan brothers) during his studies at Waterville, and in 1826 graduated cum laude as valedictorian of his class. His next few years were characterized by economic privation as he worked at various jobs, as newspaper editor and teacher, and floated up and down the east coast, from New York to Boston then to Illinois. He then moved top St.Louis, MO, which had the usual distinction of being absorbed of slavery, with its prominent slave markets, as well as a hotbed of anti-slavery agitation. Lovejoy found work at the St. Louis Times newspaper, but later felt called to Princeton Theological Seminary to study and follow his father's path into the ministry Upon graduation from Princeton, in 1834 Lovejoy returned in St.Louis, MO, where he assumed pastorate of the local Presbyterian church. There he began to punish a newspaper, the St. Louis Observer. He used this platform to advocate the abolition of African chattel slavery. This advocacy did not sit well with the local slaveholders, who were angered to have their economically foundational institution challenged. The anger of the slaveholders was amped up to 11, as it were, when in 1836 Lovejoy published a chilling, horrific account of the lynching of an AA man in St. Louis by a Caucasian mob, as well as the subsequent acquittal of the mob on all charges. This moved another Caucasian mob (or was it just the same mob?) to storm his newspaper and destroy the printing press. www.distilledhistory.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/lovejoy_grangerpress.jpgThe frenzied atmosphere of St.Louis made publishing his newspaper impossible, so Lovejoy relocated to Alton, Illinois, just 15 miles north of St. Louis. In Alton Lovejoy became an active member of the local Anti-Slavery Society, edited the Alton Observer, and continued to advocate against slavery. Unable to publish his newspaper in St. Louis, Lovejoy moved to Alton, Illinois where he became an active member of the local Anti-Slavery Society. He also began editing the Alton Observer and continued to advocate the end of slavery. The pro-slavery mobs (my they were persistent) followed Lovejoy and three times attacked the Alton Observer and threw its printing press into the Mississippi River. In early November 1837, Lovejoy received another printing press. One again, a pro-slavery mob stormed the warehouse where the press was stored. Lovejoy and some allies were there, armed, to defend the press. In the ensuing melee, Lovejoy was murdered. virdir.ncsa.illinois.edu/slevy/aware/pix/4july09/full/thumb/ElijahLovejoy.jpegLovejoy's death stirred massive indignation throughout America. The pro-slavery forces were no longer seen as just oppressing AAs, but as threatening freedom of the press, a foundational freedom of the republic. Caucasians who had been aloof and indifferent to the slavery issue began to view the pro-slavery cause with suspicion. Now, it was their rights that were at stake. The anti-slavery movement gained strength. Former president John Quincy Adams compared the reaction to Lovejoy's martyrdom to an earthquake. The Boston Recorder compared the reaction to the impact of the Battle of Lexington. Many were inspired to become abolitionists. Lovejoy's brother, Owen Lovejoy, became leader off the Illinois abolitionist movement and assisted runaway slaves via the underground railroad. He also became a friend of a rising Illinois lawyer named Abraham Lincoln. Some anti-slavery activists became even more extreme in the aftermath of the brazen murder. One quiet, still Thursday afternoon, at a little prayer meeting in a church in Ohio, messengers brought news of the murder of Elijah Lovejoy. The church attendees, ardent opponents of slavery and supporters of free AAs, silently took the sad news in. Then suddenly, a tall, lean, intense man arose, and declared in a firm voice: Here, before God, in the presence of these witnesses, from this time, I consecrate my life to the destruction of slavery. That man was John Brown. cdn.history.com/sites/2/2014/01/john-brown-E.jpegUh-Oh. Stuff just got real. images.metmuseum.org/CRDImages/ma/web-large/DT367590.jpg
|
|
|
Post by kandace on Sept 17, 2020 20:33:02 GMT -5
The Sisters Grimke: Sarah Grimke (1792-1873), Angelina Grimke (1805-1879) 3.bp.blogspot.com/_CvDCiEFbNy8/TJVGXzGUnjI/AAAAAAAAYqQ/DLzqU_v6rgs/w1200-h630-p-k-no-nu/1+Mary_Bartlett_(Mrs_Amos_Pearsons)_1795-1859_Lydia_Bartlett_(Mrs_Isaac_Allen)_1795-1879_NY.jpgThe society of 19th century America was, to use a much repeated but little understood phrase, patriarchal. Men utterly ruled in the public sphere, and wholly dominated the domestic sphere. Women were not allowed to speak at public meetings or gatherings. Women who married lost their legal independence under the law of coverture. Caucasian American women, while better educated and more respected than their counterparts in other cultures, were nonetheless forced into highly circumscribed roles. This was even more so in the American South, whose premier patriarchs were Caucasian slave masters, the most wealthy of whom would own hundreds of oppressed persons of African descent. Yet, the American Caucasian woman was often highly educated compared to her sisters in other parts of the world. Female illiteracy, at least significantly over and above male literacy, was rare. College education for women was an anamoly, yet finishing schools for young women, where they were taught the finer graces, as well as French, sometimes Greek or Latin, were the rule for the upper classes, and the middle classes imitated such schools in less elegant manners. Very wealthy young women might be provided instruction at home by tutors. It was into a world of wealthy slaveholders that the Grimke sisters were born. Their father, John F. Grimke, owned hundreds of slaves and became Chief Judge of the South Carolina Supreme Court. He was a staunch pro-slavery advocate and, in must be inferred, a ruthless slaveholder. Even as a child, little Sarah was horrified by the brutality of the slave system in which she lived. In addition to the usual subjects of painting, sewing, and music that she learned from her private tutors, Sarah learned Greek, Latin, Mathematics, and Geography from her older brother Thomas, who matriculated at Yale College. Sarah began to teach enslaved AAs, until her father discovered her activity and forbade it. (It was also against the law) Sarah's beliefs were also passed to her younger sister, Angelina. By 1821, Sarah had left her home and travelled to Philadelphia, where she joined the Quaker sect, renowned for their anti slavery views, social egalitarianism, and female preachers. In Angelina joined Sarah in Philadelphia few years later and also became a Quaker. The grinke's became active members opf the Philadelphia Female Anti-Slavery Society. In the 1830s, the sisters became acquainted with radical abolitionist William Lloyd Garrison and their activism took a public turn. The Grimke Sisters traveled the North, lecturing on the evils of slavery. Angelina published a pamphlet, An Appeal to Christian Women of the South, which urged Southern women to oppose the system of racial chattel slavery. She was subsequently threatened with imprisonment by South Carolina officials, should she return home. Uncowed, sshe wrote another pamphlet, American Slavery A It Is. The Grimke sisters were especially upsetting to the established social order of the day not just because they denounced slavery but because they did so loudly and in public. In the former half of 19th century America, women did not speak in public. It was considered outside their proper, domestic sphere. Also, the Grimke sisters were not silent about the sexual abuse of enslaved AA women by their Caucasian male masters. They in fact had firsthand knowledge of that phenomena. Their brother, Henry, sired three mixed race sons, with one of his female slaves. Indignant but not surprised (they had of course lived in the slavery system for years, where such relationships were so common most people did not bat an eye at them) the sisters ensured that the boys received educations. (Francis J Grimke became one of the most prominent AA clergymen of the late 19th/early twentieth century and a founder of the NAACP while Archibald Grimke attended Harvard Law School and became US ambassador to the Dominican Republic). In addition to their anti-slavery activities, both sisters became staunch womens rights advocates. They were, to use modern right wing lingo, nasty women. Women of their caliber are sorely needed today.
|
|
|
Post by kandace on Sept 17, 2020 20:42:43 GMT -5
Frederick William Gunn (1816-1881) connecticuthistory.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/GunneryMrGunn-226x300.jpgFrederick William Gunn was a son of Connecticut with deep roots, his first American ancestor arriving in the then new British colonies in the early first half of the 17th century. Gunn lost both his father and mother to death by his 10th year. Yet, he was reared lovingly and with firm guidance by his oldest brother in the picturesque little rural Connecticut village of Washington, just near the foothills of the Berkshire Hill country. Gunn was an apt pupil, and was able to matriculate at Yale College in the late 1830s, marring in botany. Despite his specialty, her did not enter the medical profession, as he found the amount of blood and guts far too much for his mental temperament. Gunn returned to his hometown of Washington in 1843 and took up the position of schoolmaster. His classrooms were frequently filled to overflowing. Alas, despite his popularity, Gunn soon found himself in hot water, socially speaking. Gunn's older brother, John, had raised him with decidedly anti-slavery sentiments. Gunn's abolitionist views inevitably permeated his instruction. Abolitionism, however, was staunchly opposed by Washington's Congregational Parson, Rev. Gordon Hayes. Like most Caucasian Clergymen in the antebellum period, Hayes were adamantly pro-slavery and fiercely anti-abolitionism. Gunn was soon unwelcome in Washington, was a prophet, so to speak, is often without honor in his household. Fortunately, Gunn was able to find refuge and continue his teaching at an academy in Towanda, Pennsylvania. While instructing his pupils, he would also take them on journeys into the local woodlands to experience nature. Fortunately for Gunn, the tide of opinion in his hometown turned, and in 1849 he and his new wife, Abigail returned to their mutual hometown. There they soon able to found a school on the village Green top hill, which soon welcomed girls as well as boys. (Although girls were educated separately by Abigail's sister). Gunn continued his emphasis on hiking, camping, and nature at the Gunnery. And of course Gunn's education was anti-slavery. For this reason, abolitionists, including the prominent Beecher family, sent their children to be educated at the Gunnery. Indeed, as an abolitionist Gunn saw his school as a good training ground for the military skills northern youth would have to develop in preparation for the Civil War he viewed as inevitable. His prediction of Civil War proved accurate. So, in 1861, Gunn led his first trek 30 miles from Washington to Welch’s Point at Milford, Connecticut, on Long Island Sound. There he and his male students camped there for 10 days, and in addition swimming and hunting, they performed military drills in preparation for service in the Union Army. The Gunnery continued to operate after the Civil War, and was one of the first New England academies to open its doors not just to newly free AA students but visiting Chinese students as well. As the Gunnery grew it continued to emphasize the importance of athletics and outdoorsmanship as an integral part of its educational curriculum. And in the later 19th century Gunn was recognized as the inspiration for thine then blossoming outdoor camping movement. The Gunnery is still in operation today.
|
|
|
Post by kandace on Sept 23, 2020 22:25:05 GMT -5
Cyrus Pitt Grosvenor (1792-1879) www.albionmich.com/history/histor_notebook/images_95/sCyrusPittGrosvenor.jpgActivism is not a glamorous undertaking. There is a tendency to look back on the many struggles for freedom and justice, be it the fight against slavery, the battle for women's suffrage, or the fight for environmentalism, and view them through lenses of Hollywood simplicity and excitement. Yet such struggles were the culminations of decades of bitter, sometimes violent and dangerous dedication. Initial disappointments and short term reversals were many, and few of the people who actually did the sweat and toil that made the eventual victories possible make their way into the history books and into our collective memory. The vast majority of the average people who sustained the fights for freedom have been forgotten. Yet, sometimes, actually, far more often than we think, many persons who were famous in their day, hailed as virtual paragons in the fight against oppression, fade away into an obscurity that belies their importance. The reasons for this are legion. Perhaps they just annoyed too many of their fellow activists, and so they omitted their importance when they wrote the history of their undertaking. Or, they were shy about tooting their own town, and as is often the case, if you don't toot your own horn, no one else will, so such persons are forgotten. Or, they fell prey to some scandal that clouded their heroism, and they are shuffled away into the shadows our of shame and embarrassment (this will probably be the historical fate of Bill Cosby). However, some historical figures are forgotten because their foresightedness embarrassed their contemporaries as well as our current need to whitewash the errors of the past by deeming them the inevitable result of ignorance and lack of vision. Yes, many will argue, African Chattel Slavey was bad, but, well, Caucasians back then didn't know any better. The condition of enslaved African peoples was, we are told, so degraded that it was inevitable that even the most sympathetic Caucasians, including abolitionists, would be infected by the prejudice of their day and treat African Americans with prejudiced disdain. That was why Reconstruction failed. It was simply a bridge too far for caucasians to treat AAs as social equals and accept their rapid social advancement after two centuries of racial chattel slavery. The life of Cyrus Pitt Grosvenor gives lie to the above assertions. That is why he is forgotten. But I will use this thread to remember him. Cyrus Pitt Grosvenor was born in the very early years of the American Republic. The American Revolution, as well as the unsuccessful Article of Confederation government, were a recent memory. The Father of Our Country, the first President under our Constitution, George Washington, was just finishing his first of two terms. Born in Massachusetts, Cyrus Grosvenor was the scion of a distinguished New England family. He matriculated at Dartmouth College and Princeton Theological Seminary. Grosvenor was a minister for congregations in New Haven, Salem, and Boston during the years 1825 to 1840. He was active in the Abolitionist movement, and an agent of the American Anti-Slavery Society. He was a founder of the Baptist Anti-Slavery Correspondent, a leading anti-slavery publication. He was also active in the foreign missions movement. This, however, became a source of contention. Grosvenor and other northern abolitionist clergy did not want to join missionary societies in which slaveholders were members and even prominent financial contributors. The southern Baptist's, of course, were strongly proslavery. So he and the abolitionist Baptists founded the American Baptist Free Mission Society. This split over slavery would go beyond missions and result in the schism of northern and southern Baptists, with the Southern Baptist Convention arising from the the pro-slavery faction in 1845. In 1849 Cyrus and several of his abolitionist colleagues formed New-York Central College in McGrawville, New York. He served as its first president. New-York Central College was founded to provide college education for AA at a time when virtually all colleges excluded them. Grosvenor undertook the radical step of founding a college which would admit AAs as well as women. This was far bolder than Oberlin College upon which New-York central was modeled. Oberlin admitted AAs and then women in the mid to late 1830s, while New York central was boldly founded to educate all irregardless or race or sex. As was the case with virtually all colleges of the day, classical education, teaching in Greek and Latin, was emphasized, and the Bible was held in high esteemed and studied intensely. Agricultural science as well as astronomy was also taught. Rhetoric was emphasized also. It was the first American college to have AA professors: Charles Reason, William G Allen, George Boyer Vashon. William G. Allen, a graduate of the Oneida Institute, was a Professor of Rhetoric and Greek. Under Cyrus and his successors' watchful eye, the new college became an intellectual hothouse. Its students included Asaph Hall, who married his mathematics teacher, Angeline Stinkney, and would cater discover the moons of Mars, Deimos and Phobos as well as human Ossian Armour, co-founder of the Armour Meatpacking empire and A.J Warner, later a Congressman and proponent of Bimetallism. However, the college's shining example of intellectual dynamism, racial equality, and equality between the sexes infuriated a great many people. The tracks on the school were constant, and reached a crescendo when African-American professor William G. Allen became engaged to a white student, Mary King. Fearing for their lives, Allen and King fled to New York City, where they married—the first black male–white female marriage in the country's history—and immediately left for England, never to return. This doomed the school (sigh) Its closure was inevitable, and the attacks as well as denial of financial support resulted in its closure in 1859. Although Grosvenor retired from the college in the early 1850s, his association with the school and abolitionism was such that he was forced to flee the US for England during the Civil War, as a large bounty was placed on him. Grosvenor spent his final years surveying the end of Racial Chattel Slavery and working on solving the mathematical problem of squaring the circle.
|
|
|
Post by kandace on Sept 25, 2020 16:41:36 GMT -5
Oliver Otis Howard (1830-1909) nickwestb.files.wordpress.com/2012/07/oliver-otis-howard.jpg?w=244&h=300Oliver Otis Howard was born in Maine, and became a pious new England Evangelical in an era where such religious zeal was by no means eccentric in New England (it is today all but extinct). He attended Bowdoin College and then West Point, from which he graduated fourth in his class of 46. When the Civil War broke out, Howard felt he had been called by God to fight in a righteous crusade to destroy slavery. While he fought valiantly he experienced two major defeats as a corps commander at Chancellorville and Gettysburg. And he lost an arm while leading the charge at the battle of Fair Oaks, for which he was awarded the Medal of Honor. He fought well in the Western Theatre. After the Civil War Howard was appoint to head the Freedmen’s Bureau, a Reconstruction program that helped former slaves. The Bureau had hundreds of agents in the South distributing food and medicine and finding jobs and schooling for the new citizens. Howard recognized that while government assistance was needed to get the newly freed AAs on their feet, the only sure foundation for freedom would be property ownership. With his allies the Radical Republicans, Otis began to implement program of land redistribution, giving 40 acres and a mule to newly freed slaves, using land confiscated from rebel landowners. Unfortunately, President Andrew Johnson, a bitter opponent of Reconstruction and strong hater of all things AA, reversed Howard's order and returned the land to the Confederate owners. While the Freedman's Bureau met with brutal and violent opposition and had its mission curtailed before it could fulfill its mandate, it did leave an enduring legacy in establishing schools for AAs throughout the South, including colleges. The capstone of Howard's career at the Freedman's Bureau was his role as a founder and president of Howard University. O.O. Howard's Residence on Howard University's campus parkviewdc.files.wordpress.com/2013/08/img_4497.jpg?w=438From 1867 to 1874, Howard oversaw the school which bore his name. Chartered by Congress, the private college would grow to become the preeminent Historically Black College/University in America. It educated tens of thousands of college and professional students who would go on to form the backbone of the AA middle class. In describing the Caucasian Supremacist opposition to the education of AAs, O.O. Howard spoke a truth many people would like to overlook: "The opposition to Negro education made itself felt everywhere in a combination not to allow the freed men any room or building in which a school might be taught. In 1865, 1866, and 1867, mobs of the baser classes at intervals and in all parts of the South occasionally burned school buildings and churches used as schools, flogged teachers or drove them away, and in a number of instances murdered them."
|
|
|
Post by kandace on Sept 26, 2020 20:30:03 GMT -5
Jesse Daniel Ames (1883-1972) In our current social climate, there has arisen a popular internet meme of overbearing, entitled, controlling, racist Caucasian women who feel it is their duty to police the actions of AAs in public places. Previously, such women were given alliterative nicknames: BBQ Becky, Cornerstone Caroline, Permit Patty, etc. Cellphones in hand, sneers on their lips, and entitlement in their psyche, such women bestride the national landscape, threatening AAs who they deem "out of place" with police intervention (and we know how that often ends for AAs, folks). Such women are legion (in the most literal as well as metaphorical sense), and understandably the public became somewhat tired of the process of assigning alliterative nicknames to a seemingly never ending slew of such creatures. So, just as the late genius of Marvel Comics, Stan Lee, dispensed with the narrative complexity of assigning a separate origin story for every new superhero and simply created Mutancy as the source of superpowers (because in comic book fantasy land, being exposed to massive doses of radiation gives you superpowers, whereas in our real world you just die an agonizing death from cancer), the public has dispensed with the tedium of creating ever more alliterative monikers for these bigoted nuisances and settled on a single name: Kareni.redd.it/sl96swsb9xw21.jpgJesse Daniel Ames, however, was the ultimate anti-Karen. She used her privilege as a Caucasian female to fight for AAs, in particular AA men who faced the prospect of being lynched for looking at Caucasian women. Jessie Daniel Ames was born to proud Texan parents. A bright child, she graduated high school early and entered Southwestern University in 1897. In 1904, two years after her graduation, her father accepted a railroad company position in Laredo and she joined her family there. While in Laredo she met a handsome young Spanish American war veteran and army physician, Dr. Roger Ames. She married him and bore two children. However, while pregnant with her third child, her husband die, leaving her a widow who soon had three children. Jesse moved back to live with her family and worked with her mother in running the growing Georgetown Telephone Company. As befitted a woman of her station, Jessie was active member of several civic groups, including the Georgetown Woman's Club. Ames became a committed women's suffragist, organizing the Georgetown Equal Suffrage League and overseeing a voter drive that registered over 3,000 first time women voters, in just seventeen days, for the 1918 election. She was a leader in several statewide organizations, including the Texas League of Women Voters, the Texas Committee on Prisons and Prison Reform, and the state affiliate of the American Association of University Women. She also served as a delegate-at-large to the Democratic National Conventions of 1920 and 1924. Once the women's vote was secure, Jesse turned her attention to the vital issue of psyching. Throughout the South, AA men were lynched on the pretext that they had raped or threatened to rape Caucasian women. Horrified and indignant over this reality, Ames, acting as a member of the Commission on Interracial Commission, created the Association of Southern Women for the Prevention of Lynching (ASWPL). Her organization used both education and direct action in programs to eradicate racially motivated killings . It specifically targeted individuals who claimed to promote lynching as legitimate means for defending chivalry and womanhood. d.gr-assets.com/books/1347793925l/1733128.jpgThis was by no means safe work. Ames received numerous death threats and had to proceed with caution. Despite this danger, she continued to work with the ASWPL and its successor, the Southern Regional Council, until 1944. After leaving the commission, she moved to a Tryon, North Carolina. In North Carolina she participated in Methodist Church activities, AA voter registration drives, and a women's study group on world politics. Later, in frail health, she returned to Texas, to live with a daughter, Lulu Daniel Ames.
|
|